Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Requirement Development: Specific Practices by Goal SG3

Analyze and Validate Requirements
The requirements are analyzed and validated, and a definition of required functionality is developed.
The specific practices of the Analyze and Validate Requirements specific goal support the development of the requirements in both the Develop Customer Requirements specific goal and the Develop Product Requirements specific goal. The specific practices associated with this specific goal cover analyzing and validating the requirements with respect to the user’s intended environment. Analyses are performed to determine what impact the intended operational environment will have on the ability to satisfy the stakeholders' needs, expectations, constraints, and interfaces. Considerations such as feasibility, mission needs, cost constraints,potential market size, and acquisition strategy must all be taken into account, depending on the product context. A definition of required functionality is also established. All specified usage modes for the product are considered, and a timeline analysis is generated for timecritical sequencing of functions. The objectives of the analyses are to determine candidate requirements for product concepts that will satisfy stakeholder needs, expectations, and constraints; and then translate these concepts into requirements. In parallel with this activity, the parameters that will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the product are determined based on customer input and the preliminary product concept.
Requirements are validated to increase the probability that the resulting product will perform as intended in the use environment.


SP 3.1 Establish Operational Concepts and Scenarios
Establish and maintain operational concepts and associated scenarios.
A scenario is a sequence of events that might occur in the use of the product, which is used to make explicit some of the needs of the stakeholders. In contrast, an operational concept for a product usually depends on both the design solution and the scenario. For example, the operational concept for a satellite-based communications product is quite different from one based on landlines. Since the alternative solutions have not usually been defined when preparing the initial operational concepts, conceptual solutions are developed for use when analyzing the requirements. The operational concepts are refined as solution decisions are made and lower level detailed requirements are developed.
Just as a design decision for a product may become a requirement for product components, the operational concept may become the scenarios (requirements) for product components.
The scenarios may include operational sequences, provided those sequences are an expression of customer requirements rather than operational concepts.


Typical Work Products
1. Operational concept
2. Product installation, operational, maintenance, and support concepts
3. Disposal concepts
4. Use cases
5. Timeline scenarios
6. New requirements

Subpractices
1. Develop operational concepts and scenarios that include functionality, performance, maintenance, support, and disposal as appropriate.
Identify and develop scenarios, consistent with the level of detail in the stakeholder needs, expectations, and constraints, in which the proposed product is expected to operate.
2. Define the environment the product will operate in, including boundaries and constraints.
3. Review operational concepts and scenarios to refine and discover requirements.

Operational concept and scenario development is an iterative process. The reviews should be held periodically to ensure that they agree with the requirements. The review may be in the form of a walkthrough.
4. Develop a detailed operational concept, as products and product components are selected, that defines the interaction of the product, the end user, and the environment, and that satisfies the operational, maintenance, support, and disposal needs.

SP 3.2 Establish a Definition of Required Functionality
Establish and maintain a definition of required functionality.
The definition of functionality, also referred to as "functional analysis," is the description of what the product is intended to do. The definition of functionality can include actions, sequence, inputs, outputs, or other
information that communicates the manner in which the product will be used.
Functional analysis is not the same as structured analysis in software development and does not presume a functionally oriented software design. In object-oriented software design, it relates to defining the
services. The definition of functions, their logical groupings, and their association with requirements is referred to as a functional architecture.

Typical Work Products
1. Functional architecture
2. Activity diagrams and use cases
3. Object-oriented analysis with services identified


Subpractices
1. Analyze and quantify functionality required by end users.
2. Analyze requirements to identify logical or functional partitions (e.g., subfunctions).
3. Partition requirements into groups, based on established criteria (e.g., similar functionality, performance, or coupling), to facilitate and focus the requirements analysis.

4. Consider the sequencing of time-critical functions both initially and subsequently during product-component development.
5. Allocate customer requirements to functional partitions, objects, people, or support elements to support the synthesis of solutions.
6. Allocate functional and performance requirements to functions and subfunctions.


SP 3.3 Analyze Requirements
Analyze requirements to ensure that they are necessary and sufficient. In light of the operational concept and scenarios, the requirements for one level of the product hierarchy are analyzed to determine whether they are necessary and sufficient to meet the objectives of higher levels of the product hierarchy. The analyzed requirements then provide the basis for more detailed and precise requirements for lower levels of the product hierarchy. As requirements are defined, their relationship to higher level requirements and the higher level defined functionality must be understood. One of the other actions is the determination of which key requirements will be used to track technical progress. For instance, the weight of a product or size of a software product may be monitored through development based on its risk.


Typical Work Products
1. Requirements defects reports
2. Proposed requirements changes to resolve defects
3. Key requirements
4. Technical performance measures


Subpractices
1. Analyze stakeholder needs, expectations, constraints, and external interfaces to remove conflicts and to organize into related subjects.
2. Analyze requirements to determine whether they satisfy the objectives of higher level requirements.
3. Analyze requirements to ensure that they are complete, feasible,realizable, and verifiable.

While design determines the feasibility of a particular solution, this subpractice
addresses knowing which requirements affect feasibility.

4. Identify key requirements that have a strong influence on cost,schedule, functionality, risk, or performance.
5. Identify technical performance measures that will be tracked during the development effort.
6. Analyze operational concepts and scenarios to refine the customer needs, constraints, and interfaces and to discover new requirements.
This analysis may result in more detailed operational concepts and scenarios as well as supporting the derivation of new requirements.


SP 3.4 Analyze Requirements to Achieve Balance
Analyze requirements to balance stakeholder needs and constraints.
Stakeholder needs and constraints can address cost, schedule, performance, functionality, reusable components, maintainability, or risk.

Typical Work Products
1. Assessment of risks related to requirements

Subpractices
1. Use proven models, simulations, and prototyping to analyze the balance of stakeholder needs and constraints. Results of the analyses can be used to reduce the cost of the product and the risk in developing the product.
2. Perform a risk assessment on the requirements and functional architecture.
3. Examine product life-cycle concepts for impacts of requirements on risks.


SP 3.5 Validate Requirements with Comprehensive Methods
Validate requirements to ensure the resulting product will perform as intended in the user's environment using multiple techniques as appropriate.
Requirements validation is performed early in the development effort to gain confidence that the requirements are capable of guiding a development that results in successful final validation. This activity should be integrated with risk management activities. Mature organizations will typically perform requirements validation in a more sophisticated way and will broaden the basis of the validation to include other stakeholder needs and expectations. These organizations will typically perform analyses, simulations, or prototypes to ensure that requirements will satisfy stakeholder needs and expectations.

Typical Work Products
1. Record of analysis methods and results


Subpractices
1. Analyze the requirements to determine the risk that the resulting product will not perform appropriately in its intended-use environment.
2. Explore the adequacy and completeness of requirements by developing product representations (e.g., prototypes, simulations,models, scenarios, and storyboards) and by obtaining feedback about them from relevant stakeholders.
3. Assess the design as it matures in the context of the requirements validation environment to identify validation issues and expose unstated needs and customer requirements.
The following specific practice appears in the continuous representation as SP 3.5-1, but is subsumed in the staged representation by SP 3.5, Validate Requirements with Comprehensive Methods. The specific practice is presented here in gray only as informative material.

SP 3.5-1 Validate Requirements
Validate requirements to ensure the resulting product will perform appropriately in its intended-use environment.

Typical Work Products
1. Results of requirements validation


Subpractices
1. Analyze the requirements to determine the risk that the resulting product will not perform appropriately in its intended-use environment.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Requirements Development: Specific Practices by Goal SG2

Develop Product Requirements
Customer requirements are refined and elaborated to develop product and product-component requirements.

Customer requirements are analyzed in conjunction with the development of the operational concept to derive more detailed and precise sets of requirements called "product and product-component
requirements." Product and product-component requirements address the needs associated with each product life-cycle phase. Derived requirements arise from constraints, consideration of issues implied but
not explicitly stated in the customer requirements baseline, and factors introduced by the selected architecture, the design, and the developer’s unique business considerations. The requirements are reexamined with each successive, lower level set of requirements and functional architecture, and the preferred product concept is refined.
The requirements are allocated to product functions and product components including objects, people, and processes. The traceability of requirements to functions, objects, tests, issues, or other entities is
documented. The allocated requirements and functions are the basis for the synthesis of the technical solution. As internal components are developed, additional interfaces are defined and interface requirements
established.


SP 2.1 Establish Product and Product-Component Requirements
Establish and maintain product and product-component requirements, which are based on the customer requirements.

The customer requirements may be expressed in the customer’s terms and may be nontechnical descriptions. The product requirements are the expression of these requirements in technical terms that can be
used for design decisions. An example of this translation is found in the first House of Quality Functional Deployment, which maps customer desires into technical parameters. For instance, "solid sounding door"
might be mapped to size, weight, fit, dampening, and resonant frequencies.
Product and product-component requirements address the satisfaction of customer, business, and project objectives and associated attributes, such as effectiveness and affordability.

Design constraints include specifications on product components that are derived from design decisions, rather than higher level requirements.
For Software Engineering
For example, application components that must interface with an off-theshelf database component must comply with interface requirements imposed by the selected database. Such product-component requirements are generally not traceable to higher level requirements.

Derived requirements also address the cost and performance of other life-cycle phases (e.g., production, operations, and disposal) to the extent compatible with business objectives.
The modification of requirements due to approved requirement changes is covered by the "maintain" function of this specific practice; whereas, the administration of requirement changes is covered by the
Requirements Management process area.


Typical Work Products
1. Derived requirements

2. Product requirements
3. Product-component requirements


Subpractices
1. Develop requirements in technical terms necessary for product and product-component design.
Develop architecture requirements addressing critical product qualities and performance necessary for product architecture design.
2. Derive requirements that result from design decisions.

Selection of a technology brings with it additional requirements. For instance, use of electronics requires additional technology-specific requirements such as electromagnetic interference limits.
3. Establish and maintain relationships between requirements for consideration during change management and requirements allocation.


SP 2.2 Allocate Product-Component Requirements
Allocate the requirements for each product component.
The requirements for product components of the defined solution include allocation of product performance; design constraints; and fit, form, and function to meet requirements and facilitate production. In
cases where a higher level requirement specifies performance that will be the responsibility of two or more product components, the performance must be partitioned for unique allocation to each product
component as a derived requirement.


Typical Work Products
1. Requirement allocation sheets
2. Provisional requirement allocations
3. Design constraints
4. Derived requirements
5. Relationships among derived requirements

Subpractices
1. Allocate requirements to functions.
2. Allocate requirements to product components.
3. Allocate design constraints to product components.
4. Document relationships among allocated requirements.
Relationships include dependencies in which a change in one requirement may affect other requirements.


SP 2.3 Identify Interface Requirements
Identify interface requirements.
Interfaces between functions (or between objects) are identified.Functional interfaces may drive the development of alternative solutions described in the Technical Solution process area.
Interface requirements between products or product components identified in the product architecture are defined. They are controlled as part of product and product-component integration and are an integral
part of the architecture definition.


Typical Work Products
1. Interface requirements

Subpractices
1. Identify interfaces both external to the product and internal to the product (i.e., between functional partitions or objects).
As the design progresses, the product architecture will be altered by technical solution processes, creating new interfaces between product components and components external to the product. Interfaces with product-related life-cycle processes should also be identified.
Examples of these interfaces include interfaces with test equipment,transportation systems, support systems, and manufacturing facilities.

2. Develop the requirements for the identified interfaces.
Requirements for interfaces are defined in terms of origination, destination,stimulus, data characteristics for software, and electrical and mechanical characteristics for hardware.